Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton has arrived in Yerevan on June 4,
2012, at the start of what will be her second tour of Armenia , Azerbaijan
and Georgia
in less than two years.
Armenian authorities must
demand U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton exert pressure on Turkey in
normalization of ties with Armenia, Giro Manoyan, a political affairs director
at the Armenian Revolutionary Federation-Dashnaksutyun (ARF-D Bureau), said.
“The U.S. must pressure Turkey
into establishing relations with Armenia with no preconditions,” he
said.
He further stressed the need
to use Clinton ’s visit as a good reason to
declare the international community about withdrawing Armenia ’s
signature from Armenian-Turkish protocols. Manoyan also stated that during her
visit the Armenian authorities have to urge Hillary Clinton to explain whether
the US
truly finds the self-determination principle is a key to settling the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
“The US-Armenia
relations are important to us, like the other issues of concern - the
Armenia-Turkey relations and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict - which are also
interesting to the United
States ,” he said.
Meanwhile, The Armenian National Committee of
America (ANCA) has suggested the following ten steps that Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton should undertake during her upcoming visit to the Caucasus
region to advance U.S.
interests, promote American values, and strengthen the Obama Administration’s
diplomatic standing in a pivotal region of strategic importance.
10 Steps Toward a Successful Visit by
Secretary Clinton to the Caucasus:
1) A public announcement by Secretary
Clinton that President Obama, after more than three years in office, will
finally honor his promises to recognize the Armenian Genocide and to support
the proper recognition of this crime by the U.S. Congress.
2) An official visit to the Armenian
Genocide memorial, during which she honors her own pledges to recognize the
Armenian Genocide, renounces her assertion that the Armenian Genocide is a
matter for “historical debate,” and asserts that the Administration will no
longer use the failed Turkey-Armenia Protocols as an excuse for complicity in Ankara ’s genocide denial.
3) A clear statement distancing the
U.S. from a recent NATO declaration prioritizing the principle of territorial
integrity over self-determination in settling the status of Nagorno-Karabakh,
and a commitment to strike, from a recently released State Department report,
the false assertion that Nagorno-Karabakh is a part of Azerbaijan, a
Baku-backed claim that is directly at odds with President Obama’s pledge to
work towards a durable settlement “based upon America’s founding commitment to
the principles of democracy and self determination.”
4) A public retreat from the
Administration’s proposed 19% cut in economic and democracy-building aid to Armenia , and a pledge to both work with
Congressional appropriators to honor the President’s promise to “maintain” aid
levels to Armenia ,
and also to allocate all unexpended aid that Congress has intended for
Nagorno-Karabakh.
5) A joint declaration with the
Armenian government, in the spirit of President Obama’s promise to foster
stronger U.S.-Armenia economic relations, announcing talks to implement
bilateral trade and investment initiatives, including a Trade and Investment
Framework Agreement, a Double Tax Treaty, and a Free Trade Agreement.
6) A strong stand, during her visit
to Azerbaijan , against the
Aliyev regime’s escalating pattern of threats and renewed aggression against
Nagorno-Karabakh, and a public announcement that the White House will not waive
Section 907 of the FREEDOM Support Act as long as Baku fails to commit to a peaceful resolution
of its conflict with Nagorno-Karabakh.
7) A withdrawal of the
Administration’s support, in light of Baku ’s
ongoing threats and acts of aggression, for the sale or transfer of any and all
arms or dual-use items to Azerbaijan ,
including the controversial pending sale of advanced helicopter-based sensing
equipment.
8) A visit to investigate the
medieval Armenian cemetery in Djulfa, Nakhichevan, the site of thousands of
intricate Armenian stone crosses (khatchkars) systematically destroyed by the
Azerbaijani military in December of 2005, as documented on video-tape.
9) A public expression of U.S.
support, during her trip to Georgia, for targeted U.S. economic, development,
and infrastructure assistance programs and public-private partnerships for the
Armenian-populated Javakhk region of Georgia.
10) A trip to Stepanakert to
demonstrate support for the OSCE Minsk Group peace process, to press for the
reinstatement of the Republic of Nagorno-Krabakh as a full participant in all
negotiations, and to underscore America’s longstanding and proud tradition of
supporting the right of all peoples to democratic self-determination.
Deputy Director of the Russian Institute of Political
and Military Analysis Alexander Khramchikhin believes that the visit is related
to the Iranian problem as well as to the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan . “Washington ,
apparently, is seeking to agree on a maximum number of routes of withdrawal for
the troops not to be particularly dependent on Russia
and Pakistan ,”
he said. The expert also stressed that Iran’s talks with representatives of the
“six” international mediators (the UN Security Council permanent members plus
Germany) in Baghdad, Iraq, in fact, failed, making the beginning of military
action against Iran even more likely.
Earlier, United States Secretary of Defense Leon
Panetta said that the U.S.
military is ready to deliver strikes on Iran ’s nuclear facilities. Panetta
said that the Pentagon has developed plans for different cases, including the
scenario of war with Iran .
There is also an opinion that Clinton ’s visit may give a new impetus to the
Turkish-Armenian relations. It is noteworthy that on May 27, Turkish President
Abdullah Gul unexpectedly said that the process of Turkish-Armenian
normalization “is not dead.” “There are civil and official organizations that
have set goals in this sphere. The status quo does not work for either Turkey , Armenia
or for Azerbaijan ,”
he stressed. This statement also indicates that Armenian-Turkish negotiations
might get boosted.
Experts do not expect new proposals on the part of the
United States
on the Karabakh issue. Moreover, the United States Embassy in Armenia has
disavowed a rigid wording on Karabakh in the U.S. State Department Report on
Human Rights in 2011. The report, in fact, mentioned that Karabakh belongs to Azerbaijan ,
which has angered the Armenian expert community.
The report in no way prejudges the outcome of the
negotiation process on Nagorno-Karabakh within the framework of the OSCE Minsk
Group, said the U.S. Embassy.
It said that the United States continues to defend
the equality of principles of the exclusion of the use of force or threat of
force, territorial integrity and national self-determination of the Helsinki
Final Act as the basic elements of any solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict.
Expert of the Armenian
Center for National and International
Studies Edgar Vardanyan believes that the topic of discussion will also be
post-election developments in Armenia .
“Secretary of State Clinton will urge the Armenian authorities to remove the
shortcomings on the eve of the presidential election, making it clear to them
that this is what the U.S.
friendly attitude towards Armenia
will depend on,” he said.
0 comments:
Post a Comment